Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
EarlyBay Forums
Technical
1600 TP Verses 2.0 ltr T4 engine
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Early Bay Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clem" data-source="post: 588397" data-attributes="member: 15"><p>The 2 litre Type 4 lump is 70 bhp, so thats compared to 48 bhp from the 1600 engine, so yes, a pretty impressive difference.</p><p></p><p>My mate had one whilst I had my standard 1600, and he could drop me at the drop of a hat, and on any hill. Different beasts.</p><p></p><p>One thing to consider though - much greater fuel consumption and parts that are upto 4x the price. Lots of tinware is very scarce now as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clem, post: 588397, member: 15"] The 2 litre Type 4 lump is 70 bhp, so thats compared to 48 bhp from the 1600 engine, so yes, a pretty impressive difference. My mate had one whilst I had my standard 1600, and he could drop me at the drop of a hat, and on any hill. Different beasts. One thing to consider though - much greater fuel consumption and parts that are upto 4x the price. Lots of tinware is very scarce now as well. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
EarlyBay Forums
Technical
1600 TP Verses 2.0 ltr T4 engine
Top