Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
EarlyBay Forums
Technical
Opinions on this clutch wear
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Early Bay Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="K@rlos" data-source="post: 601274" data-attributes="member: 4304"><p>Depends on the spec. If it’s got 80hp at the wheels with stock heads, minimal porting and a very mild cam then that’s pretty good, will be 100ish at flywheel. If it’s got big carbs, fancy big valve heads, lots of head work and a cam like an Engle w130 then yeah that’s pretty ****. All depends on who built it and spec.The JPM 1776 made 240hp, I know people who’ve had 2276 strokers built that haven’t made 130hp. </p><p></p><p>Subaru engines belong in Subaru’s in my opinion :lol:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="K@rlos, post: 601274, member: 4304"] Depends on the spec. If it’s got 80hp at the wheels with stock heads, minimal porting and a very mild cam then that’s pretty good, will be 100ish at flywheel. If it’s got big carbs, fancy big valve heads, lots of head work and a cam like an Engle w130 then yeah that’s pretty ****. All depends on who built it and spec.The JPM 1776 made 240hp, I know people who’ve had 2276 strokers built that haven’t made 130hp. Subaru engines belong in Subaru’s in my opinion :lol: [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
EarlyBay Forums
Technical
Opinions on this clutch wear
Top
