Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
EarlyBay Forums
Technical
009 vs svda??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Early Bay Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lefty Westy" data-source="post: 432961" data-attributes="member: 19687"><p>^^^</p><p>Wot he said...</p><p></p><p>But also quite correct about Vac Advance being the best approach at part load <u>providing the vac can is matched to the manifold vacuum</u>. SVDA is tailored to stock 1600 manifold vacuum. I doubt a set of 36IDF's would give the same vac signal, which is why peeps use the 009.</p><p></p><p>I have a cheapo 009 on my 2007 with 40DRLA's. Works a treat, no flat spots.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lefty Westy, post: 432961, member: 19687"] ^^^ Wot he said... But also quite correct about Vac Advance being the best approach at part load [u]providing the vac can is matched to the manifold vacuum[/u]. SVDA is tailored to stock 1600 manifold vacuum. I doubt a set of 36IDF's would give the same vac signal, which is why peeps use the 009. I have a cheapo 009 on my 2007 with 40DRLA's. Works a treat, no flat spots. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
EarlyBay Forums
Technical
009 vs svda??
Top