Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
EarlyBay Forums
Gallery
1967 Neptune Blue Deluxe
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Early Bay Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="K@rlos" data-source="post: 649371" data-attributes="member: 4304"><p>Bit fat then <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😬" title="😬" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f62c.png" /> unless your compression ratio is 9.5:1 or more (which I doubt it is) I’d just run it on 95. You’re not going to see any benefit from the extra money you’re spending on the higher octane. You’ve got Teflon fuel lines to so no need to worry about the e10 scaremongering either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="K@rlos, post: 649371, member: 4304"] Bit fat then 😬 unless your compression ratio is 9.5:1 or more (which I doubt it is) I’d just run it on 95. You’re not going to see any benefit from the extra money you’re spending on the higher octane. You’ve got Teflon fuel lines to so no need to worry about the e10 scaremongering either. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
EarlyBay Forums
Gallery
1967 Neptune Blue Deluxe
Top