Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
EarlyBay Forums
Technical
how much narrower is a k&l compared to bj beam?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Early Bay Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alex VW Heritage" data-source="post: 530417" data-attributes="member: 19109"><p>My understanding and on this I am no expert is that it is not narrower but that the bottom tube sits an inch or two higher and this is the main reason for people switching across as it gives the ultra slammed boys more ground clearance. Personally unless your going REALLY low there is absolutely no benifit for going backwards technology wise <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alex VW Heritage, post: 530417, member: 19109"] My understanding and on this I am no expert is that it is not narrower but that the bottom tube sits an inch or two higher and this is the main reason for people switching across as it gives the ultra slammed boys more ground clearance. Personally unless your going REALLY low there is absolutely no benifit for going backwards technology wise ;) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
EarlyBay Forums
Technical
how much narrower is a k&l compared to bj beam?
Top