uber cool said:
Christ, now I need wikipedia to translate your posts, however still non the wiser :shock:
oasis, their capturing of the zeitgeist circa '95 and their otherwise inexplicable rise to global superstardom.
discuss.
it's just that, oasis were (are) ****.
i mean, i'm not knocking them (eh ?) i've got a few of their *hit records* we went to knebworth and all that for the craic as it were, but there was just something about
them, at
that precise moment in time, and a shift in the tectonic plates of popular culture, 'lad' culture, call it what you will, that enabled them to become mega mega mega successful when let's face it all they were was a bunch of manc chancers with an eye for a pair of trainers (shamelessly borrowed from liverpool fc terrace 'culture') and an ear for a good tune (shamelessly borrowed from, er, the beatles. oh yeah, and slade).
you could play any of their songs from, say, the first three albums to a bloke who'd been, i dunno, away in space and time, planet of the apes stylee and he'd be tapping his feet, maybe chuckling a bit at how openly shameless they seemed to be when it came to having an original thought, but if you then showed this ersatz ape-man a glimpse of where they are today, with the models and the limos and the castles built exclusively from blackcurrant fruit pastilles he'd probably just laugh and say you were mental.
see also 'our friends in the north' :roll: