K@rlos said:Why do you want a 5 speed box?
Tofufi said:What's wrong with a dogleg box?
Plenty of cars have them, and when you're on the move it makes sense, as you only go into first when you're stopped. It doesn't take much to get used to it.
I fitted a Porsche 901 5-speed gearbox to my bus several years ago and it works great - including taking it around Spain. Has been fine with both my 1600 and 1955cc engines.
nobayinhell said:Tofufi said:What's wrong with a dogleg box?
Plenty of cars have them, and when you're on the move it makes sense, as you only go into first when you're stopped. It doesn't take much to get used to it.
I fitted a Porsche 901 5-speed gearbox to my bus several years ago and it works great - including taking it around Spain. Has been fine with both my 1600 and 1955cc engines.
Whats involved in this conversion? The box looks visually similar to our VW boxes, does it just bolt on?
Tofufi said:
Tofufi said:K@rlos said:Why do you want a 5 speed box?
It's a world better than a 4 speed. You just are always more likely to have a more suitable gear for the speed you're doing. Especially useful if you only have modest horsepower - my 1955cc is only around 100bhp.
The 901 gearbox I have has a taller first, second and third gears so they all follow on nicely from each other rather than having big gaps. 4th gear is roughly the same as a 3-rib gearbox, and then 5th drops the cruising rpm significantly
K@rlos said:Tofufi said:K@rlos said:Why do you want a 5 speed box?
It's a world better than a 4 speed. You just are always more likely to have a more suitable gear for the speed you're doing. Especially useful if you only have modest horsepower - my 1955cc is only around 100bhp.
The 901 gearbox I have has a taller first, second and third gears so they all follow on nicely from each other rather than having big gaps. 4th gear is roughly the same as a 3-rib gearbox, and then 5th drops the cruising rpm significantly
I’m well aware of all that... I was asking the OP to see what engine he has etc. It’s a waste of time and money putting a tall box with a gutless engine which won’t pull the longer gears, gear ratios should always be matched to the engine power band. I have a built 091 box coupled to my 2110 IDA motor, the ratios were matched to my engine, still only a 4 speed and I never not got a suitable gear.
Tofufi said:K@rlos said:Tofufi said:It's a world better than a 4 speed. You just are always more likely to have a more suitable gear for the speed you're doing. Especially useful if you only have modest horsepower - my 1955cc is only around 100bhp.
The 901 gearbox I have has a taller first, second and third gears so they all follow on nicely from each other rather than having big gaps. 4th gear is roughly the same as a 3-rib gearbox, and then 5th drops the cruising rpm significantly
I’m well aware of all that... I was asking the OP to see what engine he has etc. It’s a waste of time and money putting a tall box with a gutless engine which won’t pull the longer gears, gear ratios should always be matched to the engine power band. I have a built 091 box coupled to my 2110 IDA motor, the ratios were matched to my engine, still only a 4 speed and I never not got a suitable gear.
Actually the 5-speed box worked well with my twin carb 1600. As 4th gear is the same as a standard bus, it had the advantage you could drop down to 4th on motorway hills and maintain 55-60mph as you would do normally.
The only issue with the 1600 and 5 speed box is first gear is a bit tall, but I found that ok even living in hilly Bristol.
It's not a case that the 4 speed doesn't have a suitable gear, but the 5 speed gives you more choice. I'd bet your bus would be faster over a hilly mountain road with a 5 speed.
Enter your email address to join: