Earlybaybob
Active member
will probably take you up on that soon, cheers - I am only about 20 - 30 mins away.
rickyrooo1 said:yep, if you're localish and you need a bit of a tour round it give me a shout im in rugeleyEarlybaybob said:I dont know about the breaks - only just bought it and not had the wheels off yet!?! I will look next week when I have time and post some pics again. In summary it sounds like a "1971 early bay microbus conversion with dormobile roof" (with vents blanked off - lol)
slow-lane-Matt said:Strange how no one except VW owners find things like this interesting !!
rickyrooo1 said:it's not what i'd call a "real" crossover - they have late rear vents and lights but early fronts, 71 would be a j reg or early k - the earliest k reg crossovers would be around july 72?Lee C said:Is a bus with 5x112 stud pattern not an early crossover??
Is it a late early???
:? :? :?
Confused me sel noo :lol: :lol:
Bob, I may be wrong but vans from 1967 to 1971 had a wide stud pattern of 5x 205 with drums all round, vans from 1971 to 1979 had a smaller stud pattern of 5x112 with discs up front n drums out back.
That would be a "late" bay :lol:poptop2 said:rickyrooo1 said:it's not what i'd call a "real" crossover - they have late rear vents and lights but early fronts, 71 would be a j reg or early k - the earliest k reg crossovers would be around july 72?Lee C said:Is a bus with 5x112 stud pattern not an early crossover??
Is it a late early???
:? :? :?
Confused me sel noo :lol: :lol:
Bob, I may be wrong but vans from 1967 to 1971 had a wide stud pattern of 5x 205 with drums all round, vans from 1971 to 1979 had a smaller stud pattern of 5x112 with discs up front n drums out back.
"Real crossover" Now then - how about a late crossover, Aug 72 - may 73, High lights and square bumpers.
Fortunate Son said:Just before I bought my Dormy I looked at a "late crossover" Danbury, it was a very original van and had high indicators ie late bay front panel but had 1 year only crossover front arches and round bumpers. The owner, a very sound Welsh fella by the name of Idris Dibble (i swear it was his real name!!) had owned the van for 20 plus years and swore they were original panels. I guess there was a point in late 72 model year - June or July 72 when the factory ran out of early front panels - before they ran out of 72 front arches and went fully late.
It's a bit like calling an early xover a early, or more to the point a late crossover a late!poptop2 said:Fortunate Son said:Just before I bought my Dormy I looked at a "late crossover" Danbury, it was a very original van and had high indicators ie late bay front panel but had 1 year only crossover front arches and round bumpers. The owner, a very sound Welsh fella by the name of Idris Dibble (i swear it was his real name!!) had owned the van for 20 plus years and swore they were original panels. I guess there was a point in late 72 model year - June or July 72 when the factory ran out of early front panels - before they ran out of 72 front arches and went fully late.
I very much doubt this tbh, early crossover sept 71 until july/aug 72 - factory shut down/aug hols and tool change- later crossover aug/sept 72 until may 73. from then on in only full on lates went out of the factory.
rickyrooo1 said:it's not what i'd call a "real" crossover - they have late rear vents and lights but early fronts, 71 would be a j reg or early k - the earliest k reg crossovers would be around july 72?Lee C said:Is a bus with 5x112 stud pattern not an early crossover??
Is it a late early???
:? :? :?
Confused me sel noo :lol: :lol:
Bob, I may be wrong but vans from 1967 to 1971 had a wide stud pattern of 5x 205 with drums all round, vans from 1971 to 1979 had a smaller stud pattern of 5x112 with discs up front n drums out back.
Enter your email address to join: