Trikky2 said:
sparkywig said:Trikky2 said:
The "members" on thesanba claim it's better than hypoid. 90, and is commonly done in the States.
Apparently there's a grease suitable on sale over there.
Trikky2 said:sparkywig said:The "members" on thesanba claim it's better than hypoid. 90, and is commonly done in the States.
Apparently there's a grease suitable on sale over there.
The reason they were originally designed to be oil filled is because the way a worm and peg box works, especially under load. There are considerable forces operating on a small contact area. This means that, despite making the working parts from very hard material, over time there is going to be wear.
Lubricated with oil the microscopic particles of metal fall harmlessly to the bottom of the box.
Lubricated with grease the particles stay in the grease and work a bit like scouring powder.
Lubricating with grease is preferable for the manufacturer since it means the unit in question does not have to be made to higher tolerances to ensure it is oil tight. Hence it would be cheaper to make.
Mostly, there are good reasons why things were done in a particular way and it always surprises me when lay mechanics make changes that show they have not really thought things through or asked the question why something was done in a particular way.
I'm not saying vehicles can't be improved, they were built down to a price after all; but for something to be an improvement it has to be better than the original, not worse.
Just because something is on the Samba doesent make it right. It is only an Internet forum.
sparkywig said:I know, I was just pointing out why some steering boxes are supplied filled with grease.
mattp said:I can see steering boxes becoming an issue over the next few years with 're-con' boxes at silly money; I would also like to know what is done to re-condition them as I was not aware of replacement parts availability. I have seen an thread on here about a conversion to a re-pro late LHD box but no RHD ones as yet and how good will they be over time as generally re-pro parts do not seem to have a particularly long service life.
Graham at MIB used to so a rack kit, and CE do one which are both fair chunks of cash, the other alternative is a rascal rack kits as I have and others -a simple conversion.
I sold Mike the bits for his Rascal conversion but this has got me thinking why more people don't do this, it is easy to do but if you are relying on a garage who are unwilling or unable to fabricate parts to fit it then you need either an off the shelf kit or to sent the parts to one of the skilled restorers who can. I'd happily make up a kit based on what was made up for me when I had mine done but I am not a business and don't want the hassle or responsibility of dealing with such a kit. That said if I were able to supply the main bits for the end user to assemble and tweak then that could be ok and maybe a how to on here? I imagine I could get the kit I bought copied for maybe a further £80 (so including the core parts under £200)
Your thoughts guys as the core bits Mike bought worked out at £115 for the UJ, used bevel box and new re-con genuine rack -add sheet steel, a little tube and a rose joint and some nuts and bolts make this surely the best value?
Enter your email address to join: